individual guilty and sentence them to death on the basis of using the death penalty as extended self defense would require the same certainty that the individual in question was the actual killer a certainty that cannot be expressed in courts and. If the government can say that a person deserves to die then why can't an ordinary person do the same? Last year in Boston, a fifteen year-old boy was killed in a fight over jewelry. It has been proposed, within the contentions of the three listed purposes, that the death penalty meets the responsibilities of the Western penal system.
The question of whether the death penalty is a deterrent to violent crime is probably moot from its very proposal as being unanswerable with some indication that it is a probable no; a recent study by Professor Michael Radelet and Traci Lacock of the University. If a person commits a crime as horrible as murder they would probably rather die themselves then sit in prison for the rest of their lives. Any answer is bound to be arbitrary or impose some moral absolutism which are the two key components of the death penalty's application: the arbitrary designation of the death penalty and the moral absolutism behind it that asserts its unwavering authority. Statistically, from, there was an average.1 exonerations per year from death row. If a jury makes a mistake and a person is falsely accused of murder when they find out they messed up they want to take the. The death penalty is a controversial issue that has been debated for years.
Conclusion paragraph for death penalty research papers